Real Madrid and FC Barcelona Franco era?
У меня загорелся спор с одним моим хорошим другом, который болеет за Мадрид. Влияло ли правительство во главе с диктатором Франко на победы Реала в чемпионате или нет. Друг хвастался "великой" историей и статистикой выигранных чемпионатов, я парировал тем что львиная доля была выиграна благодаря диктатора. За аргументами мы кинулись в Гугл, и вот что я нашел. Сначала свою статистику пихал какой-то промадридский тип, а потом его по всем статьям опускает и достойно отвечает болела Барсы. Вот его ответ.
Наслаждайтесь.
****************************************************************
LOL I must say I'm surprised by this because most of the times you sound smart... OK I proved to Valencianista and every Real Madrid fan this 100 times already and because of that I don't even bother any more because here FACTS mean nothing. You're using statistics and FACTS wrong, it's true that Barca has won 9 league titles before Franco's death but you're forgetting that Barca didn't win the league from 1960 until his death in 1974 and has won only 3 CdR trophies (1963 final was in Barcelona) in that time. In 40's Franco wasn't concentrating on football as much as he did on politics, at that time he didn't realize how big football is, he had much more important things to do than to care about football. In 50's both Barca and Real won the league 4 times each with Di Stefano and Kubala, at that time Franco realized that football players are big stars and that football stadiums attract big crowds, back then every club was associated with some political party so when Real beat a club like Barca and A.Bilbao it was just another way to show the domination of his regime over Catalans and Basques. Franco got involved in football in middle 50's when he already had control over the politics but he still didn't have the control over the people, football was his way to make people happy, Real Madrid were his Gladiators. Between civil war and in 40's he was fighting only against Catalans in political ways but in the 50's he realized that FC Barcelona is the heart and soul of Catalans, if he wanted to break the people's will he had to get rid of FC Barcelona but the more he was trying to destroy FC Barcelona the bigger they get in hearts of every Catalan. In 60's he even punished Barca with some kind of transfer ban, FC Barcelona (and some other clubs I think) weren't allow to buy any foreigners for almost 10 years. In 1974 Barca won their first title in 14 years with legendary Cruijff who started the revolution of FC Barcelona with Nunez but they won only ONE league title until 1990 because the shape of a club was really poor after decades of Franco's abusing. Nunez had to start building the club for scratch and he did more than great job, it took him only 16 years to bring Barca back among the best. Barca has won 9 league titles and 3 CL trophies since 1990 to 2010 which means that they won the same number of titles in last 20 years than in 35 years under Franco (first title was before him).
I can't do nothing but laugh to idiots that are saying ''why didn't Real win every trophy if Franco was fixing games''.... well MADRID won every trophy, for Franco was more or less the same thing, only thing that mattered was that a team from MADRID was winning.
Before Franco... FC Barcelona and Atletico Bilbao were the best Spanish clubs dominating Spanish football
from 1940 to 1974 (34 years) aka Franco's era.... Real MADRID 13 league titles, (Athletico MADRID 7 league titles), FC Barcelona 8 league titles... so both MADRID clubs together have much more than half of the league titles... in 34 years when Franco was in charge the trophy went to MADRID 20 times... just a FACT
from 1974 until 1990 (16 years) when Barca was picking up.... Real Madrid 10 league titles (A.Madrid TWO), FC Barcelona ONE
Наслаждайтесь.
****************************************************************
LOL I must say I'm surprised by this because most of the times you sound smart... OK I proved to Valencianista and every Real Madrid fan this 100 times already and because of that I don't even bother any more because here FACTS mean nothing. You're using statistics and FACTS wrong, it's true that Barca has won 9 league titles before Franco's death but you're forgetting that Barca didn't win the league from 1960 until his death in 1974 and has won only 3 CdR trophies (1963 final was in Barcelona) in that time. In 40's Franco wasn't concentrating on football as much as he did on politics, at that time he didn't realize how big football is, he had much more important things to do than to care about football. In 50's both Barca and Real won the league 4 times each with Di Stefano and Kubala, at that time Franco realized that football players are big stars and that football stadiums attract big crowds, back then every club was associated with some political party so when Real beat a club like Barca and A.Bilbao it was just another way to show the domination of his regime over Catalans and Basques. Franco got involved in football in middle 50's when he already had control over the politics but he still didn't have the control over the people, football was his way to make people happy, Real Madrid were his Gladiators. Between civil war and in 40's he was fighting only against Catalans in political ways but in the 50's he realized that FC Barcelona is the heart and soul of Catalans, if he wanted to break the people's will he had to get rid of FC Barcelona but the more he was trying to destroy FC Barcelona the bigger they get in hearts of every Catalan. In 60's he even punished Barca with some kind of transfer ban, FC Barcelona (and some other clubs I think) weren't allow to buy any foreigners for almost 10 years. In 1974 Barca won their first title in 14 years with legendary Cruijff who started the revolution of FC Barcelona with Nunez but they won only ONE league title until 1990 because the shape of a club was really poor after decades of Franco's abusing. Nunez had to start building the club for scratch and he did more than great job, it took him only 16 years to bring Barca back among the best. Barca has won 9 league titles and 3 CL trophies since 1990 to 2010 which means that they won the same number of titles in last 20 years than in 35 years under Franco (first title was before him).
I can't do nothing but laugh to idiots that are saying ''why didn't Real win every trophy if Franco was fixing games''.... well MADRID won every trophy, for Franco was more or less the same thing, only thing that mattered was that a team from MADRID was winning.
Before Franco... FC Barcelona and Atletico Bilbao were the best Spanish clubs dominating Spanish football
from 1940 to 1974 (34 years) aka Franco's era.... Real MADRID 13 league titles, (Athletico MADRID 7 league titles), FC Barcelona 8 league titles... so both MADRID clubs together have much more than half of the league titles... in 34 years when Franco was in charge the trophy went to MADRID 20 times... just a FACT
from 1974 until 1990 (16 years) when Barca was picking up.... Real Madrid 10 league titles (A.Madrid TWO), FC Barcelona ONE
from 1990 until today (20 years), no Franco or his faithful ''friends'' in Spanish FA.... Real Madrid 6 league titles (A.Madrid 1), FC Barcelona 9 league titles
So by purse logic... Barca was better BEFORE Franco and Barca is better now AFTER Franco... is it really so hard to understand??
edit: Heheh... it was always interesting that in this section facts mean nothing, I will try again, it's getting boring for me personally because this is 233rd time I'm talking about this here and it's always the same story...
1. As I said before, he didn't give a sh!t about football from sport point of view, only reason why he supported MADRID clubs (Real and Atleti) was because of political reasons... as I said already
2. look at #1.
3. I thought I made that one very clear too..... his direct influence on Spanish football started in middle 50's with Di Stefano.... as I already said (for 5th time only in this question) he was politician first and then everything else, do you really think his priority was football, you guys sound like he was fighting against FC Barcelona and not against Catalonia. Until 1943 when Bernabeu became the president Real was small club, but it became on of the best just in 10 years after. Don't you think it's a coincidence that a man (Bernabeu) who was fighting under Franco's fascists becomes the president of the club because of some kind of fan violence after the game against BARCA and the club becomes #1 club in country and city after that???
4. That happened because of some woman, not because of political reasons. The general that had to leave said or did something to a wife of his close friend so he kicked him out.... it just PROVES that he was connected with Franco because, he would be DEAD for sure if he didn't have his protection.
5. Di Stefano came to Spain to play for FC Barcelona but because of Bernabeu and Franco he had to play for Real Madrid.... Real Madrid was the best in that period because they STOLE the player that came to FC Barcelona... lol... AFTER that Real Madrid started with their domination, before that Barca, A.Bilbao and A.Madrid were best Spanish clubs. Without Di Stefano Real wouldn't be half the club they're today and Barca would have 5 more CL and La Liga trophies..... if Di Stefano stayed in Barca as he was suppose to now Barca would have 24 La Liga titles and Real 26... that's how important Di Stefano was in Barca vs Real rivalry.
6. we can talk about referees 10 days and we still wouldn't get to half of it, top (richest) teams in every league are protected, it always was like that and it always will be, Real was no exception
7. says who??? FC Barcelona and Atletico Bilbao were best Spanish clubs before Franco..... Atletico MADRID and Real MADRID were the best during Franco's regime.... Real Madrid was the best after Franco because Barca was rebuilding and FC BARCELONA is the best in last 20 years when Catalans are politically strong just as Spaniards. Not even Juan Carlos who was FRANCO's man can't influence football as much as they did before, only way is with the refs which they're doing great.
''the post Franco regime had a transition period of 3 years. After 3 years, NO relationships with the dictator remained in the Spanish government''..... LMAO you must be kidding right, it says clear in the link YOU posted...
''Franco had HAND-PICKED Juan Carlos and had overseen his education. He was considered an enigma, having publicly sworn LOYALTY to the principles of FRANCO's National Movement while privately giving vague indications of sympathy for democratic institutions.'' .... I rest my case.
@V..... LOL go play video
"В 1943 году на домашнем стадионе Лес-Кортс в первом полуфинальном матче Кубка Генералиссимуса (Copa del Generalísimo — так был переименован новой властью Кубок Испании, он же бывший Кубок Короля) команда победила мадридский «Реал» со счетом 3:0. Перед ответным матчем клуб «удостоился» визита начальника органов безопасности Испании, напомнившего, что «Барса» продолжает играть только благодаря «великодушию режима». Мадридцы выиграли тот матч 11:1."
+1 за топик
Можно перевести на русский? :)
Тема крайне интересна!
Кстати, миринги часто кричат, что генерал болел за матрасников - полная чушь!
с 1990 до сих пор (20 лет), никакой Франко или его преданные "друзья" в испанском FA.... Реальный Мадрид 6 названий лиги (A.Madrid 1), FC Барселона 9 названий лиги
Так логикой кошелька... Barca был лучше ПЕРЕД Франко, и Barca лучше теперь ПОСЛЕ Франко... действительно настолько трудно понять??
отредактируйте: Heheh..., было всегда интересно, что в этих фактах секции ничего не означают, я попробую еще раз, это становится скучным для меня лично, потому что это - 233-ий раз, когда я говорю об этом здесь, и это всегда - та же самая история...
1. Поскольку я сказал прежде, он не давал тсс! t о футболе со спортивной точки зрения, только рассуждал, почему он поддерживал МАДРИДСКИЕ клубы (Реальный, и Atleti) был из-за политических причин..., поскольку я уже сказал
2. взгляд #1.
3. Я думал, что я сделал тот очень ясным слишком....., его прямое влияние на испанский футбол началось в середине 50-ых с Диом Стефано...., поскольку я уже сказал (в течение 5-ого раза только в этом вопросе), он был политическим деятелем сначала и затем всем остальным, сделайте Вас, действительно думают, что его приоритет был футболом, Вы, парни кажутся, что он боролся против Барселоны FC а не против Каталонии. До 1943 то, когда Bernabeu стал Реальным президентом, было маленьким клубом, но это стало на лучшего только через 10 лет после. Разве Вы не думаете, что это - совпадение, что человек (Bernabeu), кто боролся при фашистах Франко, становится президентом клуба из-за некоторого насилия поклонника после игры против BARCA, и клуб становится #1 клубом в стране и городе после этого???
4. Это случилось из-за некоторой женщины, не из-за политических причин. Генерал, который должен был уехать, сказал или сделал кое-что жене его близкого друга, таким образом он выгнал его...., только ОКАЗЫВАЕТСЯ, что он был связан с Франко, потому что, он был бы МЕРТВ наверняка, если бы у него не было своей защиты.
5. Ди Стефано приехал в Испанию, чтобы играть для Барселоны FC, но из-за Bernabeu и Франко, которого он должен был играть для Реального Мадрида.... Реальный Мадрид был лучшим в тот период, потому что они УКРАЛИ игрока, который прибыл в Барселону FC... lol... ПОСЛЕ ТОГО, КАК тот Реальный Мадрид начался с их доминирования, перед этим, Barca, A.Bilbao и A.Madrid были лучшими испанскими клубами. Без Реального Диа Стефано не была бы половина клуба, который они сегодня, и у Barca было бы еще 5 CL и трофеи Ла Лиги....., если бы Ди Стефано остался в Barca, поскольку он был, предполагают к теперь Barca, имел бы 24 названия Ла Лиги и Реальные 26..., это - то, как важный Ди Стефано был в Barca против Реальной конкуренции.
6. мы можем говорить о рефери 10 дней, и мы все еще не добрались бы до половины из этого, возглавили бы (самые богатые) команды в каждой лиге, защищены, это всегда походило на это, и это всегда будет, Реальный не было никакое исключение
"у почты режим Франко был переходный период 3 лет. После 3 лет НИКАКИЕ отношения с диктатором не оставались в испанском правительстве"..... LMAO Вы должны шутить право, это говорит ясный в связи, которую ВЫ отправили...
"Франко ПОДОБРАЛ Хуана Карлоса и наблюдал за его образованием. Его считали загадкой, публично клянясь ЛОЯЛЬНОСТЬ к принципам Национального Движения FRANCO, конфиденциально давая неопределенные признаки симпатии к демократическим институтам.".... Я отдыхаю свой случай.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Перевод не мой, поэтому строго не судите. Но думаю смысл поймете---)))
Для франко было важно чтобы команда из МАДРИДА выигрывала каталонцев, басков, и т.д. До Франко ФК Барселона и Атлетик Бильбао были лучшими Испанскими клубами доминировавшие в Испанском футболе. с 1940 - 1974 (34 года) ака Эра Франко:
Реал МАДРИД 13 титулов, Атлетико МАДРИД 7 титулов, ФК БАРСЕЛОНА 8 титулов.
С 1874 - 1990 (16 лет) пока Барса оправлялась от последствий
Реал МАДРИД 10 титулов, Атлетико МАДРИД 2 титула, ФК БАРСЕЛОНА 1 титул.
П.С. Вы понимаете что только от того что умер Франко, весь его режим никуда не делся, те же люди оставались ответственны за результаты, те же люди контролировали матчи. Испанскому правительству понадобилось минимум 10 лет чтобы отмыться от этой грязи.
С 1990 - сегодня, больше нет Франко и его фашистских друзей в испанском футболе. Реал МАДРИД 6 титулов, Атлетико МАДРИД 1 титул, ФК БАРСЕЛОНА 9 титулов!
Поидее фашисту Франко футбол был безразличен со спортивной ее стороны, единственное почему он поддерживал Мадридские команды это политические взгляды. До 1943 когда Бернабэу стал президентом, Реал был очень маленьким клубом, но он стал одним из лучших всего за 10 лет после его прихода. ДиСтефано приехал в Испанию играть за Барсу, но из-за Бернабэу и Франко, его обязали играть за Реал. Реал был лучшим в то время потому что они УКРАЛИ футболиста у Барсы... лол.. Без ДиСтефано Реал не был бы и половиной сегодняшнего Реала, и у Барсы было бы на 5 Лиг Чемпионов и Чемпионатов БОЛЬШЕ чем сейчас. Если бы ДиСтефано остался в Барсе, то у Барсы было бы 24 титула Ла Лиги против Реаловских 26. Вот насколько был важен ДиСтефано в противостоянии Барса-Мадрид.
Di Stéfano's transfer to Spain would prove controversial. The mission to secure the signing of di Stéfano to Barcelona had first been given to Ramón Trias Fargas, who, besides being a lawyer and expert in commercial law, was the son of one of the share-holders of Millonarios, where di Stéfano was playing at the time. According to Trias Fargas, Barcelona's own management effectively obstructed the transfer when club president Marti Carreto also involved Barcelona chief scout Josep Samitier in the negotiations. Samitier, in his turn, brought in his Colombian friend, Joan Busquets, to speed up the talks with the Colombian club. Busquets, a director of Millonarios' rivals Santa Fé, seem to have tried more to sabotage the deal than to secure it. After issuing a harsh ultimatum to Millonarios to accept a modest offer for the player he organized di Stéfano's defection from Colombia when the ultimatum was rejected, despite Di Stéfano owing the club money. River Plate, who owned the rights of the player from 1955 onwards, had accepted the transfer on the condition that Millonarios also agreed upon the transfer, which they, after what they perceived as Busquets' bullying tactics, weren't interested in doing. Trias Fargas' negotiations with the Colombians regarding a transfer sum were also breaking down when Carreto, despite assurances to Trias Fargas that he would pay whatever price Trias Fargas thought necessary, rejected a figure whenever it was agreed between the lawyer and the Colombians. Trias Fargas blamed Carreto claiming Barcelona directors had allowed him to spend $20,000 but Carreto only accepted to offer $10,000 plus the player's debts.
In 1953, Di Stéfano signed a deal with Barcelona and FIFA, who didn't know anything about Di Stéfano having left Millonarios without permission, authorized the transfer from River Plate. The Spanish Federation, however, did not recognize the deal. According to Andres Ramírez, the Spanish Football Federation secretary, both Millonarios (who owned the rights of the player until the end of 1954, according to the agreements reached in the Lima Pact) and River Plate's consent were needed in order for di Stéfano to sign up with a Spanish club. Indeed Millonarios had reported FIFA the anomalous situation of the Argentinian, so FIFA itself demanded the Spanish Federation to solve the problem. On 13 May 1953, he arrived in Spain to conclude his contract with Barcelona but during the discussions with the Federation, Real Madrid's president Santiago Bernabéu, acting upon the apparent division within the Barcelona management, convinced him to sign for them instead.
During the parallel negotiations between the two Spanish clubs and Millonarios, the Spanish Federation issued a ban on foreign players in the Spanish league. On 15 September, the Spanish Federation made public the decision, which club presidents Carreto and Bernabéu had signed, to allow di Stéfano four seasons in Spain - two for each team, to be played alternately. The agreement created such a storm of protests by the rest of the Barcelona management and the fans that Carreto resigned a week later. The reasons for Barcelona's decision to let the player go to Madrid are disputed by the two clubs. While Real Madrid have always maintained it was a voluntary decision by Barcelona[citation needed], their rivals held that it was a decision made under pressure from Franco's government.This incident exacerbated the traditional enmity between the two clubs.[8]